B. V. D. Zandschulp
Ganar
J. Struff
Ganar
Mikael Ymer vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W L L
Form
W W L L W L W L W LCara A Cara: Ymer 3 - 1 Zandschulp
Ellas han jugado 11 conjuntos en total, con Ymer victoriosa 7 y Zandschulp victoriosa 4. El último partido entre Ymer y Zandschulp fue en el Rothesay International - Eastbourne, el 27-06-2023, Cuartos de First, Grass, con Mikael Ymer obteniendo la victoria 3-6 6-4 6-2
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mikael Ymer | 3 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
Rothesay International - Eastbourne(27-06-2023)
3
6
6
4
6
2
| Ymer | Estadísticas | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 751 | Ranking | 88 |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 26 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 63% (285-171) | Total de Carrera V/D | 62% (363-227) |
| 64% (7-4) | Ganar/Perder | 43% (10-13) |
| $1,465,685 | Prize Money de Carrera | $3,456,920 |
| 1 | YTD Títulos | 0 |
| 0 | Dura H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Arcilla H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Interior H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Hierba H2H | 0 |
Próxima partido
24 Apr 2025 / First
IMPARES
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Enfrentamientos Directos Entre Ymer Y Zandschulp
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
3
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Mikael Ymer
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Estadísticas H2H De Ymer VS Zandschulp Estadísticas H2H utilizadas en nuestras predicciones
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Partidos cara a cara | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Ganados | 4 |
| 53 | Juegos Ganados | 44 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 21 | Faltas dobles totales | 16 |
| 1:57:35 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:57:35 |
| 63% (205/327) | % De Primer Servicio | 64% (176/276) |
| 66% (135/205) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 63% (111/176) |
| 47% (57/122) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 46% (46/100) |
| 58% (18/31) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 52% (15/29) |
| 43% (119/276) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 41% (135/327) |
| 75% (3/4) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 33% (1/3) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 33% (3/1) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Mikael Ymer
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Mikael Ymer
60%
(
75 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mikael Ymer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Julien De Cuyper
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mikael Ymer
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Botic Van De Zandschulp
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (285/171) | Win/Loss | 62% (363/227) |
| 58% (648/476) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (827/591) |
| 53% (5590/5041) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7112/6286) |
| 61% (59/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 60% (101/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (170/105) |
| 67% (112/54) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 52% (13/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 954 | Aces Total | 2883 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1248 | Total Double Faults | 2137 |
| 1:37:55 | Average Match Time | 1:35:39 |
| 416.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.85 |
| 66% (20600/31022) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24045/39045) |
| 65% (13449/20600) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17182/24045) |
| 49% (5056/10422) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7226/15003) |
| 44% (1471/3328) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1778/4121) |
| 42% (12690/30520) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16358/40230) |
| 53% (19/17) | Slam W/L | 62% (32/20) |
| 48% (12/13) | Masters W/L | 50% (26/26) |
| 67% (16/8) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 50% (60/60) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (122/57) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 78% (56/16) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 64% (265/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/539) |
| 47% (17/36) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 50% (61/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (100/183) |
| 65% (109/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/195) |
| 89% (253/224) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
| 11% (253/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
| 29% (203/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (246/59) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
